How to choose diameter of a wire?
To choose is thicker or thinner? More expensively or the cheapest way?
Increase in diameter of a wire increases a resource of service of a sieve of a roar several times, increases replacement intervals, reduces the number of repair hours necessary to replace a sieve on a roar, considerably reduces expenses. It seems that one pluses. That is the more thickly the best of all and more economically.
But it is necessary to remember about one factor - Productivity.
Increase in diameter of a wire leads to reduction of live section, that is to capacity reduction. For example when replacing a grid with a cell 40 with a diameter of wire of 5,0 on 6,0 or 8,0 live section decreases from 79% to 76% and 73% and capacity falls for 4% and 7%. Other example: replacement of a grid with a cell 5 with a diameter of wire of 2,0 on 3,0.
Live section decreases from 51% to 45%, and capacity falls already for 15%. Before replacement it is necessary to calculate load of a roar on which will be established a grid. If differs in 4-7% it is not considerable - then it is necessary to make replacement. If received differs is essential and does load of a roar close to critical it is worth refusing replacement.
The similar situation similarly occurs when replacing metal corrugated gauzes of GOST 3306-88 on rubber and polyurethane a sieve, on the punched sheets...
I recommend once again, not to be afraid of experiments, to try and at you it will turn out. Production more than 50 standard sizes of grids corrugated, made in accordance with GOST 3306-88 is possible.